Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Llama 4 Scout

Compare Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Llama 4 Scout API pricing: input/output token costs, cache pricing, context windows, workload estimates, and routing fit.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

gemini · gemini/gemini-3.1-flash-lite

Input
$0.25
Output
$1.5
Context
1M

Llama 4 Scout

deepinfra · deepinfra/meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct

Input
$0.08
Output
$0.3
Context
327.7K

Quick take

Llama 4 Scout has the lower input price at $0.08 per 1M input tokens. Llama 4 Scout is cheaper for the example blended workload below. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has the larger context window at 1M tokens.

Choose Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite if...

  • Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is safer for long documents, repository analysis, and RAG prompts because it has the larger context window.
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is stronger when the same large prompt or document is reused because it supports prompt caching.
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is required if images, screenshots, or visual documents are part of the workflow.

Choose Llama 4 Scout if...

  • Llama 4 Scout is the better default for cost-sensitive traffic and repeated high-volume calls.
  • Llama 4 Scout gives more room for long generated answers, reports, or code output.

Example workload cost

Estimates use input tokens plus 20% output tokens. They exclude provider discounts, cache hits, and tool/search surcharges.

Workload Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Llama 4 Scout Cheaper
1M input + 200K output $0.55 $0.14 Llama 4 Scout
10M input + 2M output $5.50 $1.40 Llama 4 Scout
100M input + 20M output $55.00 $14.00 Llama 4 Scout

Context, output, and capability fit

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite provides the larger context window. Check max output separately when the task needs long reports, code generation, or full-document rewrites.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite max output
65.5K
Llama 4 Scout max output
327.7K
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite features
prompt caching, function calling, vision
Llama 4 Scout features
function calling

Risk notes for Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

  • No major capability risk is flagged in this snapshot, but provider pages should still be verified before production routing.

Risk notes for Llama 4 Scout

  • No prompt caching in this snapshot: repeated long-context calls may be more expensive.

Routing tags

budgetfasthigh-volumestablemultimodalcache-friendlyragopen-weightlong-contextlocal-open

Related comparisons