Model comparison

GPT-5.5 Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Compare GPT-5.5 Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite API pricing: input/output token costs, cache pricing, context windows, workload estimates, and routing fit.

GPT-5.5 Pro

openai · gpt-5.5-pro

Input
$30
Output
$180
Context
1.1M

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

gemini · gemini/gemini-3.1-flash-lite

Input
$0.25
Output
$1.5
Context
1M

Quick take

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has the lower input price at $0.25 per 1M input tokens. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is cheaper for the example blended workload below. GPT-5.5 Pro has the larger context window at 1.1M tokens.

Choose GPT-5.5 Pro if...

  • GPT-5.5 Pro is safer for long documents, repository analysis, and RAG prompts because it has the larger context window.
  • GPT-5.5 Pro gives more room for long generated answers, reports, or code output.

Choose Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite if...

  • Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is the better default for cost-sensitive traffic and repeated high-volume calls.

Example workload cost

Estimates use input tokens plus 20% output tokens. They exclude provider discounts, cache hits, and tool/search surcharges.

Workload GPT-5.5 Pro Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Cheaper
1M input + 200K output $66.00 $0.55 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
10M input + 2M output $660.00 $5.50 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
100M input + 20M output $6,600.00 $55.00 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Context, output, and capability fit

GPT-5.5 Pro provides the larger context window. Check max output separately when the task needs long reports, code generation, or full-document rewrites.

GPT-5.5 Pro max output
128K
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite max output
65.5K
GPT-5.5 Pro features
prompt caching, function calling, vision
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite features
prompt caching, function calling, vision

Risk notes for GPT-5.5 Pro

  • High output price: cap max tokens for verbose generation workloads.

Risk notes for Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

  • No major capability risk is flagged in this snapshot, but provider pages should still be verified before production routing.

Routing tags

frontierpremiumreasoningcodingagentslong-contextmultimodalcache-friendlyragbudgetfasthigh-volumestable

Related comparisons