Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Compare Claude Opus 4.8 vs Mistral Medium 3.5 API pricing: input/output token costs, cache pricing, context windows, workload estimates, and routing fit.

Claude Opus 4.8

anthropic · claude-opus-4-8

Input
$5
Output
$25
Context
1M

Mistral Medium 3.5

mistral · mistral/mistral-medium-3-5

Input
$1.5
Output
$7.5
Context
262.1K

Quick take

Mistral Medium 3.5 has the lower input price at $1.5 per 1M input tokens. Mistral Medium 3.5 is cheaper for the example blended workload below. Claude Opus 4.8 has the larger context window at 1M tokens.

Choose Claude Opus 4.8 if...

  • Claude Opus 4.8 is safer for long documents, repository analysis, and RAG prompts because it has the larger context window.
  • Claude Opus 4.8 is stronger when the same large prompt or document is reused because it supports prompt caching.

Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 if...

  • Mistral Medium 3.5 is the better default for cost-sensitive traffic and repeated high-volume calls.
  • Mistral Medium 3.5 gives more room for long generated answers, reports, or code output.

Example workload cost

Estimates use input tokens plus 20% output tokens. They exclude provider discounts, cache hits, and tool/search surcharges.

Workload Claude Opus 4.8 Mistral Medium 3.5 Cheaper
1M input + 200K output $10.00 $3.00 Mistral Medium 3.5
10M input + 2M output $100.00 $30.00 Mistral Medium 3.5
100M input + 20M output $1,000.00 $300.00 Mistral Medium 3.5

Context, output, and capability fit

Claude Opus 4.8 provides the larger context window. Check max output separately when the task needs long reports, code generation, or full-document rewrites.

Claude Opus 4.8 max output
128K
Mistral Medium 3.5 max output
262.1K
Claude Opus 4.8 features
prompt caching, function calling, vision
Mistral Medium 3.5 features
function calling, vision

Risk notes for Claude Opus 4.8

  • High output price: cap max tokens for verbose generation workloads.

Risk notes for Mistral Medium 3.5

  • No prompt caching in this snapshot: repeated long-context calls may be more expensive.

Routing tags

frontierpremiumreasoningcodingagentslong-contextmultimodalcache-friendlyragopen-weightenterpriselocal-open

Related comparisons