Model comparison

GPT-5.5 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.8

Compare GPT-5.5 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.8 API pricing: input/output token costs, cache pricing, context windows, workload estimates, and routing fit.

GPT-5.5 Pro

openai · gpt-5.5-pro

Input
$30
Output
$180
Context
1.1M

Claude Opus 4.8

anthropic · claude-opus-4-8

Input
$5
Output
$25
Context
1M

Quick take

Claude Opus 4.8 has the lower input price at $5 per 1M input tokens. Claude Opus 4.8 is cheaper for the example blended workload below. GPT-5.5 Pro has the larger context window at 1.1M tokens.

Choose GPT-5.5 Pro if...

  • GPT-5.5 Pro is safer for long documents, repository analysis, and RAG prompts because it has the larger context window.

Choose Claude Opus 4.8 if...

  • Claude Opus 4.8 is the better default for cost-sensitive traffic and repeated high-volume calls.

Example workload cost

Estimates use input tokens plus 20% output tokens. They exclude provider discounts, cache hits, and tool/search surcharges.

Workload GPT-5.5 Pro Claude Opus 4.8 Cheaper
1M input + 200K output $66.00 $10.00 Claude Opus 4.8
10M input + 2M output $660.00 $100.00 Claude Opus 4.8
100M input + 20M output $6,600.00 $1,000.00 Claude Opus 4.8

Context, output, and capability fit

GPT-5.5 Pro provides the larger context window. Check max output separately when the task needs long reports, code generation, or full-document rewrites.

GPT-5.5 Pro max output
128K
Claude Opus 4.8 max output
128K
GPT-5.5 Pro features
prompt caching, function calling, vision
Claude Opus 4.8 features
prompt caching, function calling, vision

Risk notes for GPT-5.5 Pro

  • High output price: cap max tokens for verbose generation workloads.

Risk notes for Claude Opus 4.8

  • High output price: cap max tokens for verbose generation workloads.

Routing tags

frontierpremiumreasoningcodingagentslong-contextmultimodalcache-friendlyrag

Related comparisons