Model comparison

Qwen3.6 Plus vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Compare Qwen3.6 Plus vs Mistral Medium 3.5 API pricing: input/output token costs, cache pricing, context windows, workload estimates, and routing fit.

Qwen3.6 Plus

openrouter · openrouter/qwen/qwen3.6-plus

Input
$0.325
Output
$1.95
Context
1M

Mistral Medium 3.5

mistral · mistral/mistral-medium-3-5

Input
$1.5
Output
$7.5
Context
262.1K

Quick take

Qwen3.6 Plus has the lower input price at $0.325 per 1M input tokens. Qwen3.6 Plus is cheaper for the example blended workload below. Qwen3.6 Plus has the larger context window at 1M tokens.

Choose Qwen3.6 Plus if...

  • Qwen3.6 Plus is the better default for cost-sensitive traffic and repeated high-volume calls.
  • Qwen3.6 Plus is safer for long documents, repository analysis, and RAG prompts because it has the larger context window.

Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 if...

  • Mistral Medium 3.5 gives more room for long generated answers, reports, or code output.

Example workload cost

Estimates use input tokens plus 20% output tokens. They exclude provider discounts, cache hits, and tool/search surcharges.

Workload Qwen3.6 Plus Mistral Medium 3.5 Cheaper
1M input + 200K output $0.72 $3.00 Qwen3.6 Plus
10M input + 2M output $7.15 $30.00 Qwen3.6 Plus
100M input + 20M output $71.50 $300.00 Qwen3.6 Plus

Context, output, and capability fit

Qwen3.6 Plus provides the larger context window. Check max output separately when the task needs long reports, code generation, or full-document rewrites.

Qwen3.6 Plus max output
65.5K
Mistral Medium 3.5 max output
262.1K
Qwen3.6 Plus features
function calling, vision
Mistral Medium 3.5 features
function calling, vision

Risk notes for Qwen3.6 Plus

  • No prompt caching in this snapshot: repeated long-context calls may be more expensive.

Risk notes for Mistral Medium 3.5

  • No prompt caching in this snapshot: repeated long-context calls may be more expensive.

Routing tags

codingreasoningopen-weightbudgetlocal-openfrontieragentsmultimodalenterpriserag

Related comparisons