Model comparison

Grok 4.5 vs Cohere Command A

Compare Grok 4.5 vs Cohere Command A API pricing: input/output token costs, cache pricing, context windows, workload estimates, and routing fit.

Grok 4.5

xai · grok-4.5

Input
$2
Output
$6
Context
500K

Cohere Command A

cohere_chat · command-a-03-2025

Input
$2.5
Output
$10
Context
256K

Quick take

Grok 4.5 has the lower input price at $2 per 1M input tokens. Grok 4.5 is cheaper for the example blended workload below. Grok 4.5 has the larger context window at 500K tokens.

Choose Grok 4.5 if...

  • Grok 4.5 is the better default for cost-sensitive traffic and repeated high-volume calls.
  • Grok 4.5 is safer for long documents, repository analysis, and RAG prompts because it has the larger context window.
  • Grok 4.5 is stronger when the same large prompt or document is reused because it supports prompt caching.

Choose Cohere Command A if...

  • Cohere Command A gives more room for long generated answers, reports, or code output.

Example workload cost

Estimates use input tokens plus 20% output tokens. They exclude provider discounts, cache hits, and tool/search surcharges.

Workload Grok 4.5 Cohere Command A Cheaper
1M input + 200K output $3.20 $4.50 Grok 4.5
10M input + 2M output $32.00 $45.00 Grok 4.5
100M input + 20M output $320.00 $450.00 Grok 4.5

Context, output, and capability fit

Grok 4.5 provides the larger context window. Check max output separately when the task needs long reports, code generation, or full-document rewrites.

Grok 4.5 max output
n/a
Cohere Command A max output
8K
Grok 4.5 features
prompt caching, function calling, vision
Cohere Command A features
function calling

Risk notes for Grok 4.5

  • No major capability risk is flagged in this snapshot, but provider pages should still be verified before production routing.

Risk notes for Cohere Command A

  • No prompt caching in this snapshot: repeated long-context calls may be more expensive.

Routing tags

frontierreasoningagentslong-contextmultimodalcache-friendlyragenterprise-rag

Related comparisons