Model comparison

GPT-6 Astra vs Llama 4 Scout

Compare GPT-6 Astra vs Llama 4 Scout API pricing: input/output token costs, cache pricing, context windows, workload estimates, and routing fit.

GPT-6 Astra

openai · gpt-6-astra

Input
$10
Output
$50
Context
1.1M

Llama 4 Scout

deepinfra · deepinfra/meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct

Input
$0.1
Output
$0.3
Context
327.7K

Quick take

Llama 4 Scout has the lower input price at $0.1 per 1M input tokens. Llama 4 Scout is cheaper for the example blended workload below. GPT-6 Astra has the larger context window at 1.1M tokens.

Choose GPT-6 Astra if...

  • GPT-6 Astra is safer for long documents, repository analysis, and RAG prompts because it has the larger context window.
  • GPT-6 Astra is stronger when the same large prompt or document is reused because it supports prompt caching.
  • GPT-6 Astra is required if images, screenshots, or visual documents are part of the workflow.

Choose Llama 4 Scout if...

  • Llama 4 Scout is the better default for cost-sensitive traffic and repeated high-volume calls.
  • Llama 4 Scout gives more room for long generated answers, reports, or code output.

Example workload cost

Estimates use input tokens plus 20% output tokens. They exclude provider discounts, cache hits, and tool/search surcharges.

Workload GPT-6 Astra Llama 4 Scout Cheaper
1M input + 200K output $20.00 $0.16 Llama 4 Scout
10M input + 2M output $200.00 $1.60 Llama 4 Scout
100M input + 20M output $2,000.00 $16.00 Llama 4 Scout

Context, output, and capability fit

GPT-6 Astra provides the larger context window. Check max output separately when the task needs long reports, code generation, or full-document rewrites.

GPT-6 Astra max output
128K
Llama 4 Scout max output
327.7K
GPT-6 Astra features
prompt caching, function calling, vision
Llama 4 Scout features
function calling

Risk notes for GPT-6 Astra

  • High output price: cap max tokens for verbose generation workloads.

Risk notes for Llama 4 Scout

  • No prompt caching in this snapshot: repeated long-context calls may be more expensive.

Routing tags

frontierpremiumreasoningcodingagentslong-contextmultimodalcache-friendlyragbudgethigh-volumeopen-weightlocal-open

Related comparisons