Model comparison

GPT-6 Astra vs GLM-5.3

Compare GPT-6 Astra vs GLM-5.3 API pricing: input/output token costs, cache pricing, context windows, workload estimates, and routing fit.

GPT-6 Astra

openai · gpt-6-astra

Input
$10
Output
$50
Context
1.1M

GLM-5.3

cloudflare · glm-5.3

Input
$1.4
Output
$4.4
Context
1M

Quick take

GLM-5.3 has the lower input price at $1.4 per 1M input tokens. GLM-5.3 is cheaper for the example blended workload below. GPT-6 Astra has the larger context window at 1.1M tokens.

Choose GPT-6 Astra if...

  • GPT-6 Astra is safer for long documents, repository analysis, and RAG prompts because it has the larger context window.
  • GPT-6 Astra gives more room for long generated answers, reports, or code output.
  • GPT-6 Astra is required if images, screenshots, or visual documents are part of the workflow.

Choose GLM-5.3 if...

  • GLM-5.3 is the better default for cost-sensitive traffic and repeated high-volume calls.

Example workload cost

Estimates use input tokens plus 20% output tokens. They exclude provider discounts, cache hits, and tool/search surcharges.

Workload GPT-6 Astra GLM-5.3 Cheaper
1M input + 200K output $20.00 $2.28 GLM-5.3
10M input + 2M output $200.00 $22.80 GLM-5.3
100M input + 20M output $2,000.00 $228.00 GLM-5.3

Context, output, and capability fit

GPT-6 Astra provides the larger context window. Check max output separately when the task needs long reports, code generation, or full-document rewrites.

GPT-6 Astra max output
128K
GLM-5.3 max output
n/a
GPT-6 Astra features
prompt caching, function calling, vision
GLM-5.3 features
prompt caching, function calling

Risk notes for GPT-6 Astra

  • High output price: cap max tokens for verbose generation workloads.

Risk notes for GLM-5.3

  • No major capability risk is flagged in this snapshot, but provider pages should still be verified before production routing.

Routing tags

frontierpremiumreasoningcodingagentslong-contextmultimodalcache-friendlyragopen-weightlocal-open

Related comparisons