Model comparison

GPT-5.6 Terra vs GPT-5.5 Pro

Compare GPT-5.6 Terra vs GPT-5.5 Pro API pricing: input/output token costs, cache pricing, context windows, workload estimates, and routing fit.

GPT-5.6 Terra

openai · gpt-5.6-terra

Input
$2.5
Output
$15
Context
1.1M

GPT-5.5 Pro

openai · gpt-5.5-pro

Input
$30
Output
$180
Context
1.1M

Quick take

GPT-5.6 Terra has the lower input price at $2.5 per 1M input tokens. GPT-5.6 Terra is cheaper for the example blended workload below. GPT-5.6 Terra has the larger context window at 1.1M tokens.

Choose GPT-5.6 Terra if...

  • GPT-5.6 Terra is the better default for cost-sensitive traffic and repeated high-volume calls.
  • GPT-5.6 Terra is stronger when the same large prompt or document is reused because it supports prompt caching.

Choose GPT-5.5 Pro if...

  • GPT-5.5 Pro is a reasonable pick when its provider, latency, or integration path fits your stack better.

Example workload cost

Estimates use input tokens plus 20% output tokens. They exclude provider discounts, cache hits, and tool/search surcharges.

Workload GPT-5.6 Terra GPT-5.5 Pro Cheaper
1M input + 200K output $5.50 $66.00 GPT-5.6 Terra
10M input + 2M output $55.00 $660.00 GPT-5.6 Terra
100M input + 20M output $550.00 $6,600.00 GPT-5.6 Terra

Context, output, and capability fit

GPT-5.6 Terra provides the larger context window. Check max output separately when the task needs long reports, code generation, or full-document rewrites.

GPT-5.6 Terra max output
128K
GPT-5.5 Pro max output
128K
GPT-5.6 Terra features
prompt caching, function calling, vision
GPT-5.5 Pro features
function calling, vision

Risk notes for GPT-5.6 Terra

  • No major capability risk is flagged in this snapshot, but provider pages should still be verified before production routing.

Risk notes for GPT-5.5 Pro

  • High output price: cap max tokens for verbose generation workloads.
  • No prompt caching in this snapshot: repeated long-context calls may be more expensive.

Routing tags

frontierreasoningcodingagentslong-contextmultimodalcache-friendlyragpremium

Related comparisons