Model comparison

GPT-5.6 Sol vs GLM-5.3 Flash

Compare GPT-5.6 Sol vs GLM-5.3 Flash API pricing: input/output token costs, cache pricing, context windows, workload estimates, and routing fit.

GPT-5.6 Sol

openai · gpt-5.6-sol

Input
$4
Output
$20
Context
1.1M

GLM-5.3 Flash

cloudflare · glm-5.3-flash

Input
$0.15
Output
$0.5
Context
1M

Quick take

GLM-5.3 Flash has the lower input price at $0.15 per 1M input tokens. GLM-5.3 Flash is cheaper for the example blended workload below. GPT-5.6 Sol has the larger context window at 1.1M tokens.

Choose GPT-5.6 Sol if...

  • GPT-5.6 Sol is safer for long documents, repository analysis, and RAG prompts because it has the larger context window.
  • GPT-5.6 Sol gives more room for long generated answers, reports, or code output.

Choose GLM-5.3 Flash if...

  • GLM-5.3 Flash is the better default for cost-sensitive traffic and repeated high-volume calls.

Example workload cost

Estimates use input tokens plus 20% output tokens. They exclude provider discounts, cache hits, and tool/search surcharges.

Workload GPT-5.6 Sol GLM-5.3 Flash Cheaper
1M input + 200K output $8.00 $0.25 GLM-5.3 Flash
10M input + 2M output $80.00 $2.50 GLM-5.3 Flash
100M input + 20M output $800.00 $25.00 GLM-5.3 Flash

Context, output, and capability fit

GPT-5.6 Sol provides the larger context window. Check max output separately when the task needs long reports, code generation, or full-document rewrites.

GPT-5.6 Sol max output
128K
GLM-5.3 Flash max output
n/a
GPT-5.6 Sol features
prompt caching, function calling, vision
GLM-5.3 Flash features
prompt caching, function calling, vision

Risk notes for GPT-5.6 Sol

  • High output price: cap max tokens for verbose generation workloads.

Risk notes for GLM-5.3 Flash

  • No major capability risk is flagged in this snapshot, but provider pages should still be verified before production routing.

Routing tags

frontierpremiumreasoningcodingagentslong-contextmultimodalcache-friendlyragbudgetopen-weightlocal-open

Related comparisons