Model comparison

GPT-5.6 Cyber vs GPT-5.5 Pro

Compare GPT-5.6 Cyber vs GPT-5.5 Pro API pricing: input/output token costs, cache pricing, context windows, workload estimates, and routing fit.

GPT-5.6 Cyber

openai · gpt-5.6-cyber

Input
$12.5
Output
$75
Context
400K

GPT-5.5 Pro

openai · gpt-5.5-pro

Input
$30
Output
$180
Context
1.1M

Quick take

GPT-5.6 Cyber has the lower input price at $12.5 per 1M input tokens. GPT-5.6 Cyber is cheaper for the example blended workload below. GPT-5.5 Pro has the larger context window at 1.1M tokens.

Choose GPT-5.6 Cyber if...

  • GPT-5.6 Cyber is the better default for cost-sensitive traffic and repeated high-volume calls.
  • GPT-5.6 Cyber is stronger when the same large prompt or document is reused because it supports prompt caching.

Choose GPT-5.5 Pro if...

  • GPT-5.5 Pro is safer for long documents, repository analysis, and RAG prompts because it has the larger context window.

Example workload cost

Estimates use input tokens plus 20% output tokens. They exclude provider discounts, cache hits, and tool/search surcharges.

Workload GPT-5.6 Cyber GPT-5.5 Pro Cheaper
1M input + 200K output $27.50 $66.00 GPT-5.6 Cyber
10M input + 2M output $275.00 $660.00 GPT-5.6 Cyber
100M input + 20M output $2,750.00 $6,600.00 GPT-5.6 Cyber

Context, output, and capability fit

GPT-5.5 Pro provides the larger context window. Check max output separately when the task needs long reports, code generation, or full-document rewrites.

GPT-5.6 Cyber max output
128K
GPT-5.5 Pro max output
128K
GPT-5.6 Cyber features
prompt caching, function calling, vision
GPT-5.5 Pro features
function calling, vision

Risk notes for GPT-5.6 Cyber

  • High output price: cap max tokens for verbose generation workloads.

Risk notes for GPT-5.5 Pro

  • High output price: cap max tokens for verbose generation workloads.
  • No prompt caching in this snapshot: repeated long-context calls may be more expensive.

Routing tags

frontierpremiumreasoningcodingagentslong-contextmultimodalcache-friendlycybersecuritylimited-availabilityrag

Related comparisons