Model comparison

GPT-5.5 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Compare GPT-5.5 vs Llama 4 Maverick API pricing: input/output token costs, cache pricing, context windows, workload estimates, and routing fit.

GPT-5.5

openai · gpt-5.5

Input
$5
Output
$30
Context
1.1M

Llama 4 Maverick

deepinfra · deepinfra/meta-llama/Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct-FP8

Input
$0.15
Output
$0.6
Context
1M

Quick take

Llama 4 Maverick has the lower input price at $0.15 per 1M input tokens. Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper for the example blended workload below. GPT-5.5 has the larger context window at 1.1M tokens.

Choose GPT-5.5 if...

  • GPT-5.5 is safer for long documents, repository analysis, and RAG prompts because it has the larger context window.
  • GPT-5.5 is stronger when the same large prompt or document is reused because it supports prompt caching.
  • GPT-5.5 is required if images, screenshots, or visual documents are part of the workflow.

Choose Llama 4 Maverick if...

  • Llama 4 Maverick is the better default for cost-sensitive traffic and repeated high-volume calls.
  • Llama 4 Maverick gives more room for long generated answers, reports, or code output.

Example workload cost

Estimates use input tokens plus 20% output tokens. They exclude provider discounts, cache hits, and tool/search surcharges.

Workload GPT-5.5 Llama 4 Maverick Cheaper
1M input + 200K output $11.00 $0.27 Llama 4 Maverick
10M input + 2M output $110.00 $2.70 Llama 4 Maverick
100M input + 20M output $1,100.00 $27.00 Llama 4 Maverick

Context, output, and capability fit

GPT-5.5 provides the larger context window. Check max output separately when the task needs long reports, code generation, or full-document rewrites.

GPT-5.5 max output
128K
Llama 4 Maverick max output
1M
GPT-5.5 features
prompt caching, function calling, vision
Llama 4 Maverick features
function calling

Risk notes for GPT-5.5

  • High output price: cap max tokens for verbose generation workloads.

Risk notes for Llama 4 Maverick

  • No prompt caching in this snapshot: repeated long-context calls may be more expensive.

Routing tags

frontierreasoningcodingagentslong-contextmultimodalcache-friendlyragopen-weightlocal-open

Related comparisons