Model comparison

GPT-5.5 Pro vs Llama 4 Scout

Compare GPT-5.5 Pro vs Llama 4 Scout API pricing: input/output token costs, cache pricing, context windows, workload estimates, and routing fit.

GPT-5.5 Pro

openai · gpt-5.5-pro

Input
$30
Output
$180
Context
1.1M

Llama 4 Scout

deepinfra · deepinfra/meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct

Input
$0.08
Output
$0.3
Context
327.7K

Quick take

Llama 4 Scout has the lower input price at $0.08 per 1M input tokens. Llama 4 Scout is cheaper for the example blended workload below. GPT-5.5 Pro has the larger context window at 1.1M tokens.

Choose GPT-5.5 Pro if...

  • GPT-5.5 Pro is safer for long documents, repository analysis, and RAG prompts because it has the larger context window.
  • GPT-5.5 Pro is stronger when the same large prompt or document is reused because it supports prompt caching.
  • GPT-5.5 Pro is required if images, screenshots, or visual documents are part of the workflow.

Choose Llama 4 Scout if...

  • Llama 4 Scout is the better default for cost-sensitive traffic and repeated high-volume calls.
  • Llama 4 Scout gives more room for long generated answers, reports, or code output.

Example workload cost

Estimates use input tokens plus 20% output tokens. They exclude provider discounts, cache hits, and tool/search surcharges.

Workload GPT-5.5 Pro Llama 4 Scout Cheaper
1M input + 200K output $66.00 $0.14 Llama 4 Scout
10M input + 2M output $660.00 $1.40 Llama 4 Scout
100M input + 20M output $6,600.00 $14.00 Llama 4 Scout

Context, output, and capability fit

GPT-5.5 Pro provides the larger context window. Check max output separately when the task needs long reports, code generation, or full-document rewrites.

GPT-5.5 Pro max output
128K
Llama 4 Scout max output
327.7K
GPT-5.5 Pro features
prompt caching, function calling, vision
Llama 4 Scout features
function calling

Risk notes for GPT-5.5 Pro

  • High output price: cap max tokens for verbose generation workloads.

Risk notes for Llama 4 Scout

  • No prompt caching in this snapshot: repeated long-context calls may be more expensive.

Routing tags

frontierpremiumreasoningcodingagentslong-contextmultimodalcache-friendlyragbudgethigh-volumeopen-weightlocal-open

Related comparisons