Model comparison

GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 Scout

Compare GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 Scout API pricing: input/output token costs, cache pricing, context windows, workload estimates, and routing fit.

GLM-5.2

zai · glm-5.2

Input
$1.4
Output
$4.4
Context
1M

Llama 4 Scout

deepinfra · deepinfra/meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct

Input
$0.08
Output
$0.3
Context
327.7K

Quick take

Llama 4 Scout has the lower input price at $0.08 per 1M input tokens. Llama 4 Scout is cheaper for the example blended workload below. GLM-5.2 has the larger context window at 1M tokens.

Choose GLM-5.2 if...

  • GLM-5.2 is safer for long documents, repository analysis, and RAG prompts because it has the larger context window.
  • GLM-5.2 is stronger when the same large prompt or document is reused because it supports prompt caching.

Choose Llama 4 Scout if...

  • Llama 4 Scout is the better default for cost-sensitive traffic and repeated high-volume calls.
  • Llama 4 Scout gives more room for long generated answers, reports, or code output.

Example workload cost

Estimates use input tokens plus 20% output tokens. They exclude provider discounts, cache hits, and tool/search surcharges.

Workload GLM-5.2 Llama 4 Scout Cheaper
1M input + 200K output $2.28 $0.14 Llama 4 Scout
10M input + 2M output $22.80 $1.40 Llama 4 Scout
100M input + 20M output $228.00 $14.00 Llama 4 Scout

Context, output, and capability fit

GLM-5.2 provides the larger context window. Check max output separately when the task needs long reports, code generation, or full-document rewrites.

GLM-5.2 max output
128K
Llama 4 Scout max output
327.7K
GLM-5.2 features
prompt caching, function calling
Llama 4 Scout features
function calling

Risk notes for GLM-5.2

  • No major capability risk is flagged in this snapshot, but provider pages should still be verified before production routing.

Risk notes for Llama 4 Scout

  • No prompt caching in this snapshot: repeated long-context calls may be more expensive.

Routing tags

frontierreasoningcodingagentslong-contextopen-weightcache-friendlyraglocal-openbudgethigh-volumemultimodal

Related comparisons