Model comparison

GLM-5.2 vs Grok 4.5

Compare GLM-5.2 vs Grok 4.5 API pricing: input/output token costs, cache pricing, context windows, workload estimates, and routing fit.

GLM-5.2

zai · glm-5.2

Input
$1.4
Output
$4.4
Context
1M

Grok 4.5

xai · grok-4.5

Input
$2
Output
$6
Context
500K

Quick take

GLM-5.2 has the lower input price at $1.4 per 1M input tokens. GLM-5.2 is cheaper for the example blended workload below. GLM-5.2 has the larger context window at 1M tokens.

Choose GLM-5.2 if...

  • GLM-5.2 is the better default for cost-sensitive traffic and repeated high-volume calls.
  • GLM-5.2 is safer for long documents, repository analysis, and RAG prompts because it has the larger context window.
  • GLM-5.2 gives more room for long generated answers, reports, or code output.

Choose Grok 4.5 if...

  • Grok 4.5 is required if images, screenshots, or visual documents are part of the workflow.

Example workload cost

Estimates use input tokens plus 20% output tokens. They exclude provider discounts, cache hits, and tool/search surcharges.

Workload GLM-5.2 Grok 4.5 Cheaper
1M input + 200K output $2.28 $3.20 GLM-5.2
10M input + 2M output $22.80 $32.00 GLM-5.2
100M input + 20M output $228.00 $320.00 GLM-5.2

Context, output, and capability fit

GLM-5.2 provides the larger context window. Check max output separately when the task needs long reports, code generation, or full-document rewrites.

GLM-5.2 max output
128K
Grok 4.5 max output
n/a
GLM-5.2 features
prompt caching, function calling
Grok 4.5 features
prompt caching, function calling, vision

Risk notes for GLM-5.2

  • No major capability risk is flagged in this snapshot, but provider pages should still be verified before production routing.

Risk notes for Grok 4.5

  • No major capability risk is flagged in this snapshot, but provider pages should still be verified before production routing.

Routing tags

frontierreasoningcodingagentslong-contextopen-weightcache-friendlyraglocal-openmultimodal

Related comparisons