Model comparison

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Compare Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite API pricing: input/output token costs, cache pricing, context windows, workload estimates, and routing fit.

Gemini 3.6 Flash

gemini · gemini-3.6-flash

Input
$1.5
Output
$7.5
Context
1M

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

gemini · gemini-3.5-flash-lite

Input
$0.3
Output
$2.5
Context
1M

Quick take

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has the lower input price at $0.3 per 1M input tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper for the example blended workload below. Gemini 3.6 Flash has the larger context window at 1M tokens.

Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash if...

  • Gemini 3.6 Flash is a reasonable pick when its provider, latency, or integration path fits your stack better.

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite if...

  • Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is the better default for cost-sensitive traffic and repeated high-volume calls.

Example workload cost

Estimates use input tokens plus 20% output tokens. They exclude provider discounts, cache hits, and tool/search surcharges.

Workload Gemini 3.6 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Cheaper
1M input + 200K output $3.00 $0.80 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
10M input + 2M output $30.00 $8.00 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
100M input + 20M output $300.00 $80.00 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Context, output, and capability fit

Gemini 3.6 Flash provides the larger context window. Check max output separately when the task needs long reports, code generation, or full-document rewrites.

Gemini 3.6 Flash max output
65.5K
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite max output
65.5K
Gemini 3.6 Flash features
prompt caching, function calling, vision
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite features
prompt caching, function calling, vision

Risk notes for Gemini 3.6 Flash

  • No major capability risk is flagged in this snapshot, but provider pages should still be verified before production routing.

Risk notes for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

  • No major capability risk is flagged in this snapshot, but provider pages should still be verified before production routing.

Routing tags

frontierfastreasoninglong-contextmultimodalcache-friendlystablebudgetraghigh-volume

Related comparisons