Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Grok 4.5

Compare Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Grok 4.5 API pricing: input/output token costs, cache pricing, context windows, workload estimates, and routing fit.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

gemini · gemini-3.1-pro-preview

Input
$2
Output
$12
Context
1M

Grok 4.5

xai · grok-4.5

Input
$2
Output
$6
Context
500K

Quick take

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the lower input price at $2 per 1M input tokens. Grok 4.5 is cheaper for the example blended workload below. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the larger context window at 1M tokens.

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview if...

  • Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is safer for long documents, repository analysis, and RAG prompts because it has the larger context window.
  • Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview gives more room for long generated answers, reports, or code output.

Choose Grok 4.5 if...

  • Grok 4.5 is the better default for cost-sensitive traffic and repeated high-volume calls.

Example workload cost

Estimates use input tokens plus 20% output tokens. They exclude provider discounts, cache hits, and tool/search surcharges.

Workload Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Grok 4.5 Cheaper
1M input + 200K output $4.40 $3.20 Grok 4.5
10M input + 2M output $44.00 $32.00 Grok 4.5
100M input + 20M output $440.00 $320.00 Grok 4.5

Context, output, and capability fit

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview provides the larger context window. Check max output separately when the task needs long reports, code generation, or full-document rewrites.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview max output
65.5K
Grok 4.5 max output
n/a
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview features
prompt caching, function calling, vision
Grok 4.5 features
prompt caching, function calling, vision

Risk notes for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

  • Preview or beta model: verify availability and pricing before production rollout.

Risk notes for Grok 4.5

  • No major capability risk is flagged in this snapshot, but provider pages should still be verified before production routing.

Routing tags

frontierpreviewreasoninglong-contextmultimodalenterprise-ragragagentscache-friendly

Related comparisons