Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Grok 4.5

Compare Claude Sonnet 5 vs Grok 4.5 API pricing: input/output token costs, cache pricing, context windows, workload estimates, and routing fit.

Claude Sonnet 5

anthropic · claude-sonnet-5

Input
$2
Output
$10
Context
1M

Grok 4.5

xai · grok-4.5

Input
$2
Output
$6
Context
500K

Quick take

Claude Sonnet 5 has the lower input price at $2 per 1M input tokens. Grok 4.5 is cheaper for the example blended workload below. Claude Sonnet 5 has the larger context window at 1M tokens.

Choose Claude Sonnet 5 if...

  • Claude Sonnet 5 is safer for long documents, repository analysis, and RAG prompts because it has the larger context window.
  • Claude Sonnet 5 gives more room for long generated answers, reports, or code output.

Choose Grok 4.5 if...

  • Grok 4.5 is the better default for cost-sensitive traffic and repeated high-volume calls.

Example workload cost

Estimates use input tokens plus 20% output tokens. They exclude provider discounts, cache hits, and tool/search surcharges.

Workload Claude Sonnet 5 Grok 4.5 Cheaper
1M input + 200K output $4.00 $3.20 Grok 4.5
10M input + 2M output $40.00 $32.00 Grok 4.5
100M input + 20M output $400.00 $320.00 Grok 4.5

Context, output, and capability fit

Claude Sonnet 5 provides the larger context window. Check max output separately when the task needs long reports, code generation, or full-document rewrites.

Claude Sonnet 5 max output
128K
Grok 4.5 max output
n/a
Claude Sonnet 5 features
prompt caching, function calling, vision
Grok 4.5 features
prompt caching, function calling, vision

Risk notes for Claude Sonnet 5

  • No major capability risk is flagged in this snapshot, but provider pages should still be verified before production routing.

Risk notes for Grok 4.5

  • No major capability risk is flagged in this snapshot, but provider pages should still be verified before production routing.

Routing tags

frontierreasoningcodingagentsenterprise-raglong-contextmultimodalcache-friendlyrag

Related comparisons