Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Mistral Medium 3

Compare Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Mistral Medium 3 API pricing: input/output token costs, cache pricing, context windows, workload estimates, and routing fit.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

anthropic · claude-sonnet-4-6

Input
$3
Output
$15
Context
1M

Mistral Medium 3

mistral · mistral/mistral-medium-2505

Input
$0.4
Output
$2
Context
131.1K

Quick take

Mistral Medium 3 has the lower input price at $0.4 per 1M input tokens. Mistral Medium 3 is cheaper for the example blended workload below. Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the larger context window at 1M tokens.

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 if...

  • Claude Sonnet 4.6 is safer for long documents, repository analysis, and RAG prompts because it has the larger context window.
  • Claude Sonnet 4.6 gives more room for long generated answers, reports, or code output.
  • Claude Sonnet 4.6 is stronger when the same large prompt or document is reused because it supports prompt caching.

Choose Mistral Medium 3 if...

  • Mistral Medium 3 is the better default for cost-sensitive traffic and repeated high-volume calls.

Example workload cost

Estimates use input tokens plus 20% output tokens. They exclude provider discounts, cache hits, and tool/search surcharges.

Workload Claude Sonnet 4.6 Mistral Medium 3 Cheaper
1M input + 200K output $6.00 $0.80 Mistral Medium 3
10M input + 2M output $60.00 $8.00 Mistral Medium 3
100M input + 20M output $600.00 $80.00 Mistral Medium 3

Context, output, and capability fit

Claude Sonnet 4.6 provides the larger context window. Check max output separately when the task needs long reports, code generation, or full-document rewrites.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 max output
64K
Mistral Medium 3 max output
8.2K
Claude Sonnet 4.6 features
prompt caching, function calling, vision
Mistral Medium 3 features
function calling

Risk notes for Claude Sonnet 4.6

  • No major capability risk is flagged in this snapshot, but provider pages should still be verified before production routing.

Risk notes for Mistral Medium 3

  • Smaller context window: long PDFs, codebases, or RAG prompts may need chunking.
  • No prompt caching in this snapshot: repeated long-context calls may be more expensive.

Routing tags

frontierreasoningcodingagentsenterprise-ragcache-friendlyragbudgetopen-weightenterpriselocal-open

Related comparisons