Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 4.8

Compare Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 4.8 API pricing: input/output token costs, cache pricing, context windows, workload estimates, and routing fit.

Claude Opus 4.7

anthropic · claude-opus-4-7

Input
$5
Output
$25
Context
1M

Claude Opus 4.8

anthropic · claude-opus-4-8

Input
$5
Output
$25
Context
1M

Quick take

Claude Opus 4.7 has the lower input price at $5 per 1M input tokens. Claude Opus 4.7 is cheaper for the example blended workload below. Claude Opus 4.7 has the larger context window at 1M tokens.

Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if...

  • Claude Opus 4.7 is the better default for cost-sensitive traffic and repeated high-volume calls.

Choose Claude Opus 4.8 if...

  • Claude Opus 4.8 is the better default for cost-sensitive traffic and repeated high-volume calls.

Example workload cost

Estimates use input tokens plus 20% output tokens. They exclude provider discounts, cache hits, and tool/search surcharges.

Workload Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.8 Cheaper
1M input + 200K output $10.00 $10.00 Claude Opus 4.7
10M input + 2M output $100.00 $100.00 Claude Opus 4.7
100M input + 20M output $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Claude Opus 4.7

Context, output, and capability fit

Claude Opus 4.7 provides the larger context window. Check max output separately when the task needs long reports, code generation, or full-document rewrites.

Claude Opus 4.7 max output
128K
Claude Opus 4.8 max output
128K
Claude Opus 4.7 features
prompt caching, function calling, vision
Claude Opus 4.8 features
prompt caching, function calling, vision

Risk notes for Claude Opus 4.7

  • High output price: cap max tokens for verbose generation workloads.

Risk notes for Claude Opus 4.8

  • High output price: cap max tokens for verbose generation workloads.

Routing tags

frontierpremiumreasoningcodingagentslong-contextmultimodalcache-friendlyrag

Related comparisons