Model comparison

Claude Mythos 5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6

Compare Claude Mythos 5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 API pricing: input/output token costs, cache pricing, context windows, workload estimates, and routing fit.

Claude Mythos 5

anthropic · claude-mythos-5

Input
$10
Output
$50
Context
1M

Claude Sonnet 4.6

anthropic · claude-sonnet-4-6

Input
$3
Output
$15
Context
1M

Quick take

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the lower input price at $3 per 1M input tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is cheaper for the example blended workload below. Claude Mythos 5 has the larger context window at 1M tokens.

Choose Claude Mythos 5 if...

  • Claude Mythos 5 gives more room for long generated answers, reports, or code output.

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 if...

  • Claude Sonnet 4.6 is the better default for cost-sensitive traffic and repeated high-volume calls.

Example workload cost

Estimates use input tokens plus 20% output tokens. They exclude provider discounts, cache hits, and tool/search surcharges.

Workload Claude Mythos 5 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Cheaper
1M input + 200K output $20.00 $6.00 Claude Sonnet 4.6
10M input + 2M output $200.00 $60.00 Claude Sonnet 4.6
100M input + 20M output $2,000.00 $600.00 Claude Sonnet 4.6

Context, output, and capability fit

Claude Mythos 5 provides the larger context window. Check max output separately when the task needs long reports, code generation, or full-document rewrites.

Claude Mythos 5 max output
128K
Claude Sonnet 4.6 max output
64K
Claude Mythos 5 features
prompt caching, function calling, vision
Claude Sonnet 4.6 features
prompt caching, function calling, vision

Risk notes for Claude Mythos 5

  • High output price: cap max tokens for verbose generation workloads.

Risk notes for Claude Sonnet 4.6

  • No major capability risk is flagged in this snapshot, but provider pages should still be verified before production routing.

Routing tags

frontierpremiumreasoningcodingagentslong-contextmultimodalcache-friendlymythos-classlimited-availabilityragenterprise-rag

Related comparisons